Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Monday, March 15, 2010
An 1801 Whodunnit
Say you're on a jury in 1801 Massachusetts.
On trial is a young man accused of killing his sweetheart. Her family did not approve of their connection.
On the day in question, he had told two witnesses he passed on the road that he was on his way to her house to rape her (and thus force the family into letting him marry her).
Her body was found in the field beside her house with multiple stab wounds in the arm, side, breast, neck, and back. The accused stood nearby with blood on his clothing and holding a knife that was later matched to the wounds.
The accused said he was Not Guilty because ... the girl had done it to herself.
Her motive was shame over her ruined reputation - he had told her he bragged to several other men that he had been having sex with her, and in response she had committed suicide.
It was well known that the accused did not have the use of one of his arms, due to a frozen elbow joint since childhood. How could he have stabbed her successfully all those times using only his other arm?
And two neighbor girls had been outside that day, and had heard shouting, but not such that they thought someone was being murdered.
Were they lying because they didn't want to admit they had heard such screams and done nothing?
But if the girl had done it to herself, how did she manage to stab herself in the back?
And if he loved her, what was he doing in that field in any case, since according to either explanation of events it meant physical or emotional harm to the girl?
Would you find him Guilty or Not Guilty?
On trial is a young man accused of killing his sweetheart. Her family did not approve of their connection.
On the day in question, he had told two witnesses he passed on the road that he was on his way to her house to rape her (and thus force the family into letting him marry her).
Her body was found in the field beside her house with multiple stab wounds in the arm, side, breast, neck, and back. The accused stood nearby with blood on his clothing and holding a knife that was later matched to the wounds.
The accused said he was Not Guilty because ... the girl had done it to herself.
Her motive was shame over her ruined reputation - he had told her he bragged to several other men that he had been having sex with her, and in response she had committed suicide.
It was well known that the accused did not have the use of one of his arms, due to a frozen elbow joint since childhood. How could he have stabbed her successfully all those times using only his other arm?
And two neighbor girls had been outside that day, and had heard shouting, but not such that they thought someone was being murdered.
Were they lying because they didn't want to admit they had heard such screams and done nothing?
But if the girl had done it to herself, how did she manage to stab herself in the back?
And if he loved her, what was he doing in that field in any case, since according to either explanation of events it meant physical or emotional harm to the girl?
Would you find him Guilty or Not Guilty?
Labels:
History,
Massachusetts
Location:
Dedham, MA, USA
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
From: http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/mb6m
BBC Review
John Barrowman’s new album captures him on peak form. His strong vocal technique, intelligent choice of songs, sympathetically arranged, guarantees that this new album is going to be a hit.
The breezy opener When I Get My Name in Lights comes from The Boy from Oz, Australia’s first musical to hit Broadway. It featured a Tony Award-winning performance from actor Hugh Jackman in the role of singer-songwriter Peter Allen, a part that would seem tailor-made for the magnetic Barrowman.
One Night Only offers a showcase for this singer’s enviable ability to sustain a long note, float the voice into falsetto and empathise with the narrative of a song. When the tempo picks up, he’s joined by an all-girl backing group paying homage to the song’s source in Dreamgirls, the film based on the career of The Supremes. Copacabana comes up fresh as daisy through Barrowman’s sassy vocal, with piano and brass breaks emphasising the flashy nightclub setting. Thoughtful love song Unusual Way, from Nine, is marked by loving attention to detail, sustained by a seamless vocal line and an arrangement where one feels singer and orchestra are breathing as one. The warm string chart recalls the glory days of arranger Gordon Jenkins’ collaborations with Nat King Cole.
Barrowman’s simple treatment of two unsophisticated songs, My Eyes Adored You and Don’t Cry Out Loud, fall easily on the ear, though he can’t rescue The Kid Inside (from the show Is There Life After High School?, which ran for just 14 performances on Broadway back in 1982). Jodie Prenger duets with Barrowman on So Close, a song from the Disney film Enchanted, though without making any lasting impression.
It’s in the very familiar repertoire that Barrowman works wonders. Singer and orchestra relish the second build up of You’ll Never Walk Alone, but the initial presentation of the refrain is simply beautifully sung and the ending shaded off exquisitely, as it’s written in the vocal score of Carousel. I Won’t Send Roses is another touching interpretation, with a well-paced climax and a dream of a long soft note held at the end. Memory sweeps along with marvellous phrasing, an intelligent reading of the words and an arrangement that adds colour to his fresh interpretation.
All through this collection we are aware of singer and arranger-conductor Matt Brind working as a team. They are to be congratulated for their work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence. If you choose to use this review on your site please link back to this page.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Monday, March 8, 2010
Pug Spotted in Ad
Pug spotted in Chilean print advertisement for dog food!
From:
http://adsoftheworld.com/media/print/nutri_balance_husband?size=_original
From:
http://adsoftheworld.com/media/print/nutri_balance_husband?size=_original
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)